RTD is a temperature sensitive metal. The resistance of the
RTD metal is gradually changed with the changed of temperature. In applications
there are 2 wires, 3 wires, and 4 wires RTD. 2 wires RTD means that the RTD
only connected to the transmitter by using 2 wires, 3 wires means its connected
by 3 wire and 4 wire means its connected by 4 wires. So what it should be, 2
wires, 3 wires, or 4 wires RTD?
In so many articles, the author of those articles is
explaining the different between 2 wires, 3 wires, and 4 wires RTD by using an
RTD as one of Wheatstone bridge leg. The calculation is complex and it couldn’t
give a brief overview why it should be 2 wires, or others. This article try to
represent the effect of using 2 wires, 3 wires, and 4 wires RTD in a different
and a simple way. Hopefully it could give a brief understanding without complex
equation derivation.
2 wires RTD
As explain above, the 2 wires RTD only have 2 wires
connected to the transmitter. See figure 1 for the illustration. In that
circuit (figure 1), the changed of RTD resistance is measured by the
transmitter with the help of constant current source. The voltage drop is
measured to get the changed of RTD resistant. But this RTD resistant
measurement through the voltage drop isn’t valid since there are also RL2 and
RL1 (from the wire) in the voltage drop equation, see below derivation.
V = Is.RL2 + Is.RTD + Is.RL1
V = Is (RL2 + RTD + RL1)
3 wires RTD
To compensate the resistance of the wires of the RTD to the
transmitter, we should use another wire to subtract it from the voltage drop
equation. Again, by using an additional current source, we will compensate the
resistance of wires (see figure 2). From the figure 2 we can derive the
following equation:
V = V1 + V2
V1 = V – V2
V = Is2.RL2 + Is2.RTD + Is2.RL1 + Is1.RL1
V2 = Is1.RL3 + Is1.RL1 + Is2.RL1
Then, from V and V2 we can get V1,
V1 = Is2.RTD + Is2.RL2 – Is1.RL3
To get a pure resistance change of RTD, we should use same
RL2 and RL3 so that the above equation can be:
V1 = Is2.RTD
Even though it will
always have different value between RL2 & RL3, this method of compensation
(by using 3 wires RTD) is providing good accuracy and widely used in oil &
gas industries.
4 wires RTD
For best compensation
of wire resistance used by RTD, 4 wires are the best choices. It subtracts all
the wire resistance from the voltage drop equation (see figure 3 for
illustration). The resistance change of RTD will directly proportional with
voltage drop of the RTD. It can be derived from the following equation:
V = V1 + V2 + V3
V1 = I1.R3 + I1.RL1 – Is.RL3
I1 = 0, then
V1 = – Is.RL3
V2 = Is.RL4 + Is.RTD + Is.RL3 – I1.RL3 – I3.RL4
I1 = I3 = 0, then
V2 = Is.RL4 + Is.RTD + Is.RL3
V3 = I3.RL2 + I3.RL4 – Is.RL4
I3 = 0, then
V3 = – Is.RL4
Then V will be,
V = – Is.RL3 + Is.RL4 + Is.RTD + Is.RL3 + – Is.RL4
V = Is.RTD
From above explanation, we can conclude that 2 wires RTD is
the worst RTD type while 4 wires RTD is the best RTD type. 3 wires RTD have a
medium or good performance compare with 2 wires or 4 wires RTD. In oil &
gas industries, 2 wires RTD are very rarely used while 3 wires RTD is the most
used one and 4 wires RTD are used only for a very special application that need
a very accurate temperature measurement. As a default, we could specify in the
temperature transmitter or temperature element datasheet that the RTD type is 3
wires. It should be have a good performance for most oil & gas industries
applications.
I was doing a similar experiment like this in one of my college courses around a year ago. We did use 4 wires RTD and we did indeed produce the most accurate temperature measurement. Thanks for sharing this, it was really helpful.
ReplyDeleteRefer second last equation for 3-wire RTD (V1=Is2.RTD+Is2.RL2-Is1.RL3), I dint get how V1=Is2.RTD when RL2=RL3, Can it be please detailed.
ReplyDeletei think the currents are also taken equal in the 3 wire compensation
ReplyDeleteYou can find more information on Instrumentation here
ReplyDeletehttp://www.instrumentationtools.com/
Thanks
Bharadwaj